2 years ago
It’s not innate gender differences that hold women back (just look at this year’s Nobel Prize winners in science). It’s not even gender bias (OK, maybe a little, but that’s not the biggest problem). It’s that science is demanding and very, very competitive. No matter how family-friendly a given university is, a scientist who chooses to have a baby risks having her next big breakthrough scooped up by a competitor who chooses to spend 24-7 in the lab. Changing that will take more than a handful of policies; it will require changing the nature of the game itself. I don’t think that’s possible, and I’m not entirely convinced it’s desirable. It’s competition, after all, that spurs innovation and advancement.
»Janeen Interlandi has some interesting thoughts on the whole “why aren’t there more women scientists” thing. (via newsweek)
via newsweek
-
pizi reblogged this from newsweek
-
overthinkers reblogged this from newsweek
-
caseybriggs reblogged this from newsweek
-
i-am-- liked this
-
indiemaiden reblogged this from newsweek
-
kunstwissenschaftlerin liked this
-
kim liked this
-
friendship-classics liked this
-
thekeri liked this
-
cerpintaxt liked this
-
kambr liked this
-
whisperoftheshot liked this
-
newsish reblogged this from newsweek
-
nerdshares liked this
-
thereblogmonster liked this
-
funemployed liked this
-
fillup reblogged this from newsweek
-
thesaintterrer liked this
-
mercurialme liked this
-
newsweek posted this
